Peter Jackson Infected with King Kong Meme

I'm interested in how story-memes adapt over time. I define a story-meme as a special type of meme, a cultural text which replicates and adapts in response to changes in the media and cultural environments.  For example, how did the King Kong films adapt/change from 1933 to 1976 to 2005?  Why?  Similarly, how did the Lord of the Rings story change from the 1954-55 novels to the 2001-03 films?  Why?  Also, how do these memes begin?
   
In the clip below film director Peter Jackson talks about how he was first inspired into film making by the 1933 version of King Kong.  

It is as if the King Kong meme took over this mind, metaphorically speaking. Even to the extent that the meme was replicated in the 2005 version of King Kong directed by Jackson.



I'm am also interested in the King Kong films because of their racist overtones.  In 2005 NPR asked: Do the King Kong films perpetuate racial stereotypes?  Listen below.



And now let's combine the meme and racism ideas. There exists a certain visual meme that is related to the King Kong films and racism.  This visual meme continues to replicate itself from World War II propaganda posters to Lady Gaga album covers. Die already, visual meme.  Why doesn't it die?  Why do certain memes replicate?

The Origin of Edgar Allan Poe's Detective Stories

The following link is to a video offers a possible explanation for the origin of Edgar Allan Poe's detective stories.
Biography clip

Links to the full Biography program about Poe: Part 1 | Part 2 | Part 3 | Part 4 | Part 5
(The detective clip comes from Part 3)

Search Amazon.com for Edgar Allan Poe's detective stories

The Mysterious Mind

I've been searching for a helpful theoretical/methodological perspective to use in one of my research projects on mysteries.  I think I found a perspective.  In an unrelated political communication research project, a co-author and I are using frame analysis.  As part of the political comm research, I've been reading George Lakoff's book, The Political Mind: A Cognitive Scientist's Guide to Your Brain and Its Politics. The following quote from Lakoff's book lead me to the obvious thought of applying frame analysis to mysteries.

"Frames are among the cognitive structures we think with.  For example, when you read a murder mystery, there is a typical frame with various kinds of characters: the murderer, victim or victims, possible accomplices, suspects, a motive, a murder weapon, a detective, clues.  And there is a scenario in which the murder murders the victim and is later caught by the detective" (p. 22).

I particularly like how Lakoff and others root their discussion of frames and metaphors in biology (brain physiology).  As to whether this will be a fruitful approach, we'll see.  It should be helpful given my specific interest in studying the structure of mysteries.

NYT: "James Patterson, Inc."

The recent NYT Magazine article about prolific author James Patterson has a few key facts relevant to my current Women's Murder Club research project (see previous posts).  Johnathan Mahler interviewed Patterson and wrote the article.

According to the article:

• In 2009 Patterson sold an estimated 14 million copies of his books.  The novels appeared in 38 different languages.
• "Since 2006, one out of every 17 novels bought in the United States was written by James Patterson" (Mahler, 2010). 
• "According to Nielsen BookScan, Grisham’s, King’s and Brown’s combined U.S. sales in recent years still don’t match Patterson’s" (Mahler, 2010).
• The most recent edition of the Guinness World Records has Patterson listed as the author with the most NYT best sellers.
• 35 of his books went to No. 1 on the NYT best sellers list.  Patterson has had a total of 51 books on the list.

These stats along with other similar statistics help justify my current WMC study. Patterson's work has reached a large number of people.

In addition to these author stats, the article also talks about the strong role that Patterson takes in writing, publishing and marketing of his work.  Michael Pietsch (editor and the publisher of Little, Brown):  “Jim is at the very least co-publisher of his own books” (Mahler, 2010).

Besides working very closely with the publishers, he works closely with his group of co-authors. "He is part executive producer, part head writer, setting out the vision for each book or series and then ensuring that his writers stay the course. This kind of collaboration is second nature to Patterson from his advertising days, and it’s certainly common in other creative industries, including television" (Mahler, 2010).

According to the NYT article, the writing process for Patterson and his co-authors follows this pattern.

1. Patterson writes a detailed outline.
2. Co-author writes the chapters
3. Patterson reads, revises or sometimes rewrites
4. Co-author writes next draft.

Michael Pietsch, Patterson's publisher, compares Patterson to past mystery writers like Raymond Chandler and Dashiell Hammett in terms of plotting and pacing.

The NYT article also mentioned that a prof at Harvard Business School (John Deighton) wrote a case study about Patterson and the marketing of his books. I'd like to read that case study.  However, all I could find (online) was a listing for the case in the author's CV.

The article put most of the attention on Patterson's books and very little on his film and TV projects.  The article did mention that Patterson is currently working on a movie project with Avi Arad (producer Spider-Man, X-Men) based on "Maximum Ride," Patterson's young adult novel series.  The article also mentioned that Patterson and his partners had already "raised the financing for a new Alex Cross movie that Patterson is helping to write" (Mahler, 2010).

The Women's Murder Club is Born

In the beginning of 1st to Die (Patterson, 2001), the main character, Detective Lindsay Boxer asks her friends to help her to solve a serial murder case. The two friends, Claire, a medical examiner and Cindy, a reporter agree and the "Women's Murder Club" is born.

Boxer thinks to herself: "...I knew it could work. We could reassemble whatever clues came out of the official investigation, share what we had, cut through the political cover-your-ass and the bureaucracy. Three women, who would get a kick out of showing up the male orthodoxy. More important, we shared a heartfelt empathy for the victims" (p. 140).

Note the mention of sharing information,  "male orthodoxy" and "empathy for the victims." 

Later in 1st to Die (p. 174), while sipping beers at Susie's, a regular meeting place for the club (at least in the novels), Lindsay thinks to herself: "The Women's Murder Club. This was good. No men allowed."

In Chapter 73 a new member joins the club, Jill Bernhardt, assistant district attorney. Before Jill officially joins the group, Lindsay notes:

Claire had met her [Jill] a few times when she testified at trials. They had developed a mutual respect for each other rise through their male-dominated departments. (p. 278)

Note: The novel is told in first person from Lindsay's perspective.


After Jill officially joins the group she asks what is the group named.  At this point in the novel Lindsay has not voiced out loud what she has thinking -- "Women's Murder Club."

Lindsay says: "We're sort of a murder club."

Jill suggests: "The Margarita Posse."  Margaritas seem to be their favorite drink at Susie's.

Clarie suggests: "Bad-ass Bitches."

Cindy says: "One day, we're all gonna be running things... Homicide Chicks... That's who we are.  That's what we do."

Lindsay echoed this in thought: "we were bright, attractive, take-no-shit women.  We were going to run things -- some day" (p. 280).

When comparing the novels to the TV series, we don't see this talk of the "male orthodoxy" in the TV series.  I wonder why?  :)  This seems to be safe for a novel, but not TV.  What is it about TV that would not allow this sort of talk to air?

James Patterson on Women in his Writing

In my last post I shared some info. about why James Patterson sometimes writes from a woman's perspective, for example, in the Women's Murder Club series and in Suzanne's Diary For Nicholas.

Just found a little more info. on this.  In an undated interview, when asked about writing from a woman's perspective, Patterson says:

"I grew up in a house full of women: my mother, grandmother, three sisters, and two female cats. And I still have the buzz of their conversations in my head. As an adult, I have more female friends than male ones: I just love the way that women talk."

Notice the similarity between this answer and the answer he gave in the video found in my previous post.  Sounds like he has been asked this question many times and now has a "standard" answer.

The Women's Murder Club and Crime Solving [Video]

In the WPBF news interview below, James Patterson describes where his idea for the Women's Murder Club novel series came from.  This is relevant to my current research because the current focus of the research is on how the four women in the Women's Murder Club TV series do (or do not) approach crime solving differently than men do.

Patterson says in the interview: "I love the way women solve problems.  They do it differently than men.  When men get together they all come in and say 'I have the answer,' 'No, I have the answer.'  Women... are more collaborative.  And I think that makes for a very unique approach to crime solving."

"I grew up in a house full of women, mother, grandmother, three sisters, two female cats.  And that buzz still [inaudible] in my head.  So, that is how I think I got part, part of why I got writing that particular series."



http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=82QYH4r-_2s

What is Media Argumentation?

Media argumentation is a term used by Douglas Watson to describe how people in the media attempt to persuade their audience. While Watson's book describes the recent work mainly in the field of philosophy, there is also relevant work in the field of communication.

This site and companion blog is an attempt to bring together the work that Watson describes with the relevant mass media and communication work.  The purpose of the bridging research literatures to help us better understand arguments presented in the media (from news commentary to shows on the paranormal).  Special attention is given to the errors made in reasoning (or fallacies).

This research blog is about media argumentation.  This research blog and companion web site serve as my set of notes and data for my research projects on mystery writing. Look at this research site and blog as a work-in-progress, as an online draft of my final papers. In this case, you get to look over my shoulder as I work through these research ideas. See my profile to send email or post comments to the posts below.

The overall purpose of this research web site and blog is to better understand the use of argument and fallacies in the media.   Over time, this research blog and site will cover a variety of research topics related to media argumentation.  See the video to the right for fallacy definitions and examples of fallacies in the media.

The current focus of this research site and blog is on the arguments that Fox News commentator, Bill O'Reilly, uses in the Talking Points Memo segment of his show. 

What is a blog? How do you subscribe to a blog?

I've searched the Internet and I think the following videos do a great job in explaining basic blogging concepts (blog, reader, rss feed, etc.). After watching these videos you'll be able to subscribe to this blog and perhaps even start your own blog. Let me know if you do.

What is Popular Entertainment Education?

Entertainment-education has been traditionally defined as "the process of purposely designing and implementing a media message both to entertain and educate" about health and social issues. Traditional E-E is designed by communication researchers and is based on communication theory. Example: Communication researchers writing, producing and evaluating a radio soap opera designed to encourage family planning in Tanzania.

Popular entertainment-education is defined here as the process used by TV and film script writers to not only entertain, but to educate and move an audience regarding particular health and social issues (e.g., breast cancer, AIDS/HIV). The central social issue explored in this research blog is prejudice/race relations. What is the process that script writers have used to educate audiences about prejudice? This research blog attempts to answer that particular question.

What is a blog? How do you subscribe to a blog?

I've searched the Internet and I think the following videos do a great job in explaining basic blogging concepts (blog, reader, rss feed, etc.). After watching these videos you'll be able to subscribe to this blog and perhaps even start your own blog. Let me know if you do.

What is a blog? How do you subscribe to a blog?

I've searched the Internet and I think the following videos do a great job in explaining basic blogging concepts (blog, reader, rss feed, etc.). After watching these videos you'll be able to subscribe to this blog and perhaps even start your own blog. Let me know if you do.

What is a blog? How do you subscribe to a blog?

I've searched the Internet and I think the following videos do a great job in explaining basic blogging concepts (blog, reader, rss feed, etc.). After watching these videos you'll be able to subscribe to this blog and perhaps even start your own blog. Let me know if you do.