The chapter appeared in The Changing Conversation in America edited by Eadie and Nelson.
Ev and I wrote about Social Construction of Technology (SCOT) this way:
We said of Technological Determinism:
At the end of the chapter we included a diagram.
NOTE: There is something missing in the figure. It was included in the paper we submitted, but left out in the printing. What is missing?
What do we mean by "complete picture" (see caption of the diagram)?
Using SCOT and TD to Understand the Historical Development of Technology
How do these theories help us understand how media technologies develop?
Like the ideas of Kuhn and Burke (presented previously), technological determinism and social construction of technology are theoretical constructs that help us understand the development (or history) of technologies.
How do these theories help us better understand the history of past media technology? Books? Radio? TV? How do they help us understand the stories of Gutenberg, Edison, Woods, De Forest, Armstrong and Farnsworth? For example, how could we use the idea of social construction of technology to explain (or understand) the story of Granville Woods?
How do they help us better understand the development of more recent media technologies (computers, the PC, the Internet, etc.)? How do they help us understand the stories of Bill Gates and Steve Jobs? Mark Zuckerberg?
Share this post with others. See the Twitter, Facebook and other buttons below.
Please follow, add, friend or subscribe to help support this blog.
See more about me at my web site WilliamHartPhD.com.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Thank you for your comment.
Your comment will be reviewed.
If acceptable, it will be posted after it is carefully reviewed. The review process may take a few minutes or maybe a day or two.